Intermediary bank fees: what they cost and how to avoid them
An intermediary bank fee is a charge that a bank in the middle of an international wire takes for passing the payment on, usually as a flat amount deducted from the payment in transit. In one 2025 to 2026 sample of US dollar payments, the median deduction on payments that arrived short was $26.76. This guide explains why intermediary banks are involved, what they take, how to read the deductions in the payment message and how to avoid them.
- An intermediary bank, also called a correspondent bank, passes a payment between two banks that have no account with each other, and it can deduct its fee before passing the money on.
- Ohmyfin's analysis of 5,527 US dollar cross-border payments sent in 2025 and 2026 found that 1,901 arrived short by $1 or more, with a median deduction of $26.76.
- In the same sample, 68 of 72 US dollar payments sent with shared charges (SHA) arrived short, against 7 of 151 sent with OUR.
- Intermediary fees are usually flat per payment, so payments under $10,000 lost a median of 0.58% of their value and payments of $100,000 or more lost under 0.01%.
- In the SWIFT MT 103 message, field 56a names the intermediary institution, field 71F records charges deducted by a sending bank and field 71G records charges the sender prepaid under OUR.
- The CPMI reported that correspondent banking relationships fell by about 25% between 2011 and 2020, which leaves fewer direct routes between banks.
Intermediary bank fees: the short answer
An intermediary bank fee is the charge a bank in the middle of an international wire takes for passing the payment on. An intermediary bank, also called a correspondent bank, is a bank that sits between the sending bank and the beneficiary's bank because those two banks do not hold accounts with each other. The beneficiary is the person or company being paid.
Intermediary fees cause most short payments, where a supplier receives less than the invoice. They are hard to predict for three reasons: the sender does not choose the banks in the chain, each bank sets its own fee, and the fee is usually taken from the payment itself rather than billed to anyone.
| Bank in the chain | Its role | Can it take a fee from the payment? | Where the fee shows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sending bank | Takes the instruction and sends the payment | Usually charges the sender separately; under BEN it deducts from the amount | The sender's statement, or field 71F of the payment message |
| Intermediary (correspondent) bank | Passes the payment between banks with no direct relationship, often in the currency's home country | Yes, under SHA and BEN; under OUR it should not, or it claims the fee from the sending bank | A lower amount at the next bank; a further field 71F entry where it reports one |
| Beneficiary's bank | Credits the beneficiary's account | Yes, under its own tariff, unless the sender has prepaid it | The beneficiary's statement |
Source: Helm Editorial Team, from the Swift MT 103 message reference guide, as published on 29 October 2026.
Who pays the fees depends on the charge code the sender chooses: OUR (sender pays all), SHA (shared) or BEN (beneficiary pays). Our guide to OUR, SHA and BEN SWIFT charges covers the codes and what banks charge for each. This guide covers the intermediary fee itself: why the bank is there, what it takes, how to see it and how to avoid it.
Why a wire passes through intermediary banks
Banks cannot send money to a bank they have no account with. For a payment in a foreign currency, the sending bank needs an account somewhere in that currency's banking system, and so does the beneficiary's bank. When the two banks hold their accounts at different banks, a third bank links them.
Banks call these accounts nostro and vostro accounts. A nostro account is a bank's own account held at another bank, usually abroad and in that country's currency. A vostro account is the same account seen from the side of the bank that holds it. A US dollar payment between a bank in Vietnam and a bank in Colombia, for example, usually settles across the US dollar accounts those banks hold at banks in New York.
| Payment | A typical route | Where intermediary fees can arise |
|---|---|---|
| USD from a large US bank to a large bank abroad | Direct, if the foreign bank holds its dollar account at the US bank | Often none |
| USD from a small US bank or credit union to a bank abroad | Through the US bank's own correspondent, then the foreign bank's New York correspondent | At one or two banks |
| USD between two banks outside the US | Through each bank's US dollar correspondent in the US | At one or more banks |
| EUR, GBP or other currency sent from outside its home region | Through a correspondent in that currency's home country | At one or more banks |
Source: Helm Editorial Team, as published on 29 October 2026. Actual routes depend on each bank's correspondent arrangements.
Fewer banks now offer correspondent services than a decade ago, which lengthens some routes. The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) at the Bank for International Settlements reported in December 2021 that correspondent banking relationships fell by 4% in 2020 and by about 25% between 2011 and 2020, on data from more than 200 countries and jurisdictions. Banks in smaller markets are most affected: they have fewer direct links, so their payments more often pass through an extra bank.
How much intermediary banks take
Banks rarely publish what they deduct as intermediaries, so the best evidence is measured data. Ohmyfin, a cross-border payment tracking service, published an analysis in October 2026 of US dollar and euro payments sent in 2025 and 2026, comparing the amount sent with the amount the beneficiary's bank confirmed it credited.
| Measure | US dollar payments | Euro payments |
|---|---|---|
| Payments analyzed | 5,527 | 1,156 |
| Arrived short by 1 unit or more | 1,901 | 96 |
| Median deduction on short payments | $26.76 | €35 |
| One in four short payments lost | $51 or more | Not stated |
| One in ten short payments lost | $77 or more | €110 or more |
| Most common deduction | $10, then $20, then $25 | €20 |
Source: Ohmyfin, "Intermediary bank fees: who takes the cut, and how much", 25 October 2026, as published on 29 October 2026. Conversions and rejected payments were excluded from the sample.
The fee is flat, so it hurts small payments most
Intermediary fees are usually charged per payment, not as a percentage. In Ohmyfin's sample, US dollar payments under $10,000 lost a median of $20, or 0.58% of the amount, while payments of $100,000 or more lost a median of $25, under 0.01%. A business that pays a supplier ten small invoices a month pays the fee ten times; one consolidated payment pays it once.
Which bank takes it
Most of the money is taken by the first bank after the sender's own. Of 766 short US dollar payments where every bank reported, 658 lost money at one bank, 105 at two and 3 at three. The first bank after the sending bank took 79% of the money deducted, with a median cut of $25.69. The beneficiary's own bank deducted in 127 cases, mostly small amounts, with a median of $7.70.
Published guides put the range in similar terms. GoCardless states that $20 might be a somewhat standard intermediary fee for large transfers but that it can reach $100 or more. The charge depends on the currency and on where the sending and receiving banks are and how they are connected.
What the charge code changes
The charge code is the single biggest factor in whether an intermediary fee reaches the beneficiary. Ohmyfin's sample shows the difference on payments where the code was stated:
| Charge code | US dollar payments with the code stated | Arrived short | Median shortfall |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHA (shared) | 72 | 68 | $50 |
| OUR (sender pays) | 151 | 7 | $10 |
Source: Ohmyfin, 25 October 2026, as published on 29 October 2026. In the same analysis, none of the 59 euro payments sent with OUR arrived short.
Two points follow. First, SHA almost guarantees a deduction on a US dollar payment that passes through an intermediary. Second, OUR is not a guarantee. A bank in the chain that does not honor the OUR instruction, or a beneficiary's bank that applies its own receiving fee, can still reduce the amount. OUR moves the cost to the sender in most cases; it does not remove it.
How to see what each bank deducted
Every SWIFT payment carries a record of the charges taken along the way. In the MT 103 message, the standard format for a single customer payment, the fields below tell the story. Ask your bank for a copy of the message for any payment that arrives short.
| MT 103 field | Name | What it shows |
|---|---|---|
| 32A | Value date, currency, interbank settled amount | The amount actually passed to the next bank, after any sender's charges |
| 33B | Currency, instructed amount | The amount originally instructed; mandatory when any charges field is present |
| 56a | Intermediary institution | The bank through which the payment must pass |
| 57a | Account with institution | The bank that holds the beneficiary's account |
| 71A | Details of charges | The charge code: OUR, SHA or BEN |
| 71F | Sender's charges | Charges deducted by a sending bank in the chain; may repeat once for each bank that deducts |
| 71G | Receiver's charges | Charges prepaid by the sender under OUR |
Source: Swift, Standards MT November 2021, Message Reference Guide, MT 103 Single Customer Credit Transfer (copy published by BNZ), as published on 29 October 2026.
The network rules link the fields to the charge code. If field 71A says OUR, field 71F is not allowed and field 71G is optional. If it says SHA, 71F is optional and 71G is not allowed. If it says BEN, at least one 71F entry is mandatory. So the difference between field 33B and field 32A, plus each 71F entry, shows what each bank deducted.
Swift gpi tracking
Swift gpi is a service level that banks sign up to, and Swift reported in September 2019 that more than 60% of cross-border MT 103 payments were already sent as gpi. Its rules state that all gpi banks must provide transparency on their deductions on a transactional basis, and every gpi payment carries a UETR, a unique end-to-end transaction reference. The detailed breakdown of deductions in the gpi tracker is available to the banks, so ask your bank to read it for you. Our guide to how long an international wire takes covers tracing a payment with its UETR.
How to avoid intermediary bank fees
Intermediary fees can be reduced, moved or avoided altogether. The table sets out the methods in order of how much they remove.
| Method | How it works | Limits |
|---|---|---|
| Pay on a local rail in the local currency | A domestic payment inside one country, such as ACH in the US, SEPA in the euro area or Faster Payments in the UK, passes no correspondent bank | You need an account that can send on that rail, and the beneficiary must accept its local currency |
| Have US payers pay US account details | A US company pays a US routing and account number by ACH or Fedwire as a domestic transfer | The beneficiary needs USD account details in the US |
| Send with OUR | The sender pays the chain, so the invoice amount should arrive | A higher sending fee; a bank that does not honor OUR can still deduct |
| Use the beneficiary bank's own correspondent | Ask the supplier for its bank's US dollar correspondent and its SWIFT code, and send through it as the intermediary | Your bank must be able to route to it |
| Pay in the currency of the beneficiary's account | Avoids a conversion at the receiving bank, which the charge code does not cover | Needs a conversion before sending |
| Consolidate payments | One payment pays one set of flat fees instead of several | Must fit the payment terms agreed with the supplier |
Source: Helm Editorial Team, as published on 29 October 2026.
ACH is the US network for low-cost domestic bank transfers, and Fedwire is the Federal Reserve's same-day system for large dollar payments; our guide to SWIFT, ACH and Fedwire compares them. SEPA is the euro bank transfer system for the European Economic Area and a few other countries. On the receiving side, the same logic applies: a business paid by US customers avoids most intermediary fees when the customer can pay by a domestic US transfer, as our guide on receiving USD from overseas buyers explains.
Disclosure rules, and why businesses rely on contracts
In the United States, consumers get a disclosure that businesses do not. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's remittance rule, in Regulation E, defines covered third-party fees as fees imposed on a remittance transfer by a person other than the provider, which covers fees taken by intermediary banks. But the rule's sender is a consumer who sends money primarily for personal, family or household purposes. A company paying a supplier is outside it, so a bank has no obligation under that rule to tell a business in advance what intermediaries will take.
| Question | Consumer remittance in the US | Business wire |
|---|---|---|
| Who is the sender? | A consumer sending primarily for personal, family or household purposes | A company |
| Are third-party fees defined? | Yes: covered third-party fees, imposed by anyone other than the provider, excluding the recipient institution's own receiving fees | No equivalent definition in the rule |
| Who sets the terms? | The rule and the provider | The bank agreement and the contract with the supplier |
Source: 12 CFR 1005.30 (Regulation E, Subpart B, remittance transfers), Cornell Legal Information Institute, as published on 29 October 2026.
For a business, the protection is in the contract. Write the charge terms into the purchase order and invoice: for example, "Payment by SWIFT in USD; all bank charges, including intermediary bank charges, for the buyer's account (OUR)." If the supplier bears its own costs, say so. When a shortfall arrives, the contract decides who sends the difference, and your accountant can book the deduction as a bank charge against the right invoice rather than as an unpaid balance.
Where Helm fits
Helm is a financial technology company, not a bank. Accounts are held with regulated partner institutions. Helm sends payments by international wire and, where available, on local rails, and shows the rate, the fee and the expected arrival before you confirm:
- Local rails: where a supplier can be paid on a local rail in its own currency, there is no correspondent chain on the payment.
- Receiving into USD account details in the company's own name, with a routing and account number that receives ACH, Fedwire and SWIFT, alongside EUR and GBP details.
Each client has a named account manager, and review questions are answered in writing within one business day.
A checklist to stop short payments
- Ask the supplier for its bank's SWIFT code, its US dollar correspondent and that correspondent's SWIFT code, and put them on the payment.
- Use OUR for invoices that must arrive in full, and write the charge terms into the contract.
- Pay on a local rail in the supplier's currency where one exists.
- Consolidate small invoices into fewer payments where the terms allow.
- Ask payers in the US to pay US account details by ACH or Fedwire, not by international wire.
- For any short payment, get the MT 103 and compare fields 33B and 32A and each 71F entry.
- Ask your bank to read the gpi tracker for the payment's UETR if the message does not explain the gap.
Open a Helm account
USD, EUR and GBP accounts in your company's name, with a named account manager.
Open accountQuestions
What is an intermediary bank fee?
It is a charge taken by a bank that passes an international wire between the sending bank and the beneficiary's bank. It is usually a flat amount deducted from the payment in transit, so the beneficiary receives less than was sent.
How much do intermediary banks charge?
It varies by bank and route. Ohmyfin's analysis of US dollar payments sent in 2025 and 2026 found a median deduction of $26.76 on payments that arrived short, with the most common deductions at $10, $20 and $25, and one in ten short payments losing $77 or more.
Who pays intermediary bank fees?
It depends on the charge code. Under OUR the sender pays them, under SHA they are deducted from the payment so the beneficiary bears them, and under BEN the beneficiary pays all charges.
Does OUR stop intermediary bank fees?
It moves them to the sender in most cases but does not guarantee the full amount. In Ohmyfin's sample, 7 of 151 US dollar payments sent with OUR still arrived short, with a median shortfall of $10, against 68 of 72 sent with SHA.
Why are there intermediary banks on my wire?
Because the sending and receiving banks do not hold accounts with each other in the payment's currency. A US dollar payment between two banks outside the US, for example, usually settles across their dollar accounts at banks in New York.
How can I avoid intermediary bank fees?
Pay on a local rail in the beneficiary's currency where possible, have US payers pay US account details by ACH or Fedwire, send with OUR, route through the beneficiary bank's own correspondent and consolidate small payments.
Are intermediary bank fees a percentage of the payment?
Usually not. They are generally flat per payment, which is why Ohmyfin found a median loss of 0.58% on US dollar payments under $10,000 and under 0.01% on payments of $100,000 or more.
How do I find out which bank deducted the fee?
Ask your bank for the MT 103 message and compare the instructed amount in field 33B with the settled amount in field 32A and any 71F entries. For a gpi payment, your bank can also read the deductions in the Swift gpi tracker using the UETR.
What is field 56A on a SWIFT payment?
Field 56a in the MT 103 message names the intermediary institution, the bank through which the payment must pass. If it is present, field 57a, the bank holding the beneficiary's account, must be present too.
Do US disclosure rules cover intermediary fees on business wires?
No. The CFPB's remittance rule defines covered third-party fees, but its sender is a consumer sending primarily for personal, family or household purposes. Business payments are governed by the bank agreement and the contract with the supplier.
References
- Ohmyfin: Intermediary bank fees: who takes the cut, and how much (25 October 2026)
- Swift: MT 103 Single Customer Credit Transfer, Message Reference Guide, Standards MT November 2021 (copy published by BNZ)
- Swift: gpi for corporates (Association of Corporate Treasurers)
- Bank for International Settlements: Correspondent banking trends persisted in 2020, even as payment landscape changed, new data show (13 December 2021)
- 12 CFR 1005.30, Remittance transfer definitions (Cornell Legal Information Institute)
- GoCardless: How to avoid intermediary bank fees
- BNP Paribas: Improving cross-border payments, how SWIFT's global payment initiative is changing the landscape
This guide is general information for businesses, not financial, legal or tax advice. Rules, fees and timings were checked against the sources listed on the review date and may change.