Comparisons

Merchant cash advance vs hire purchase: which is better for equipment?

By Helm, Business Funding Specialists

Key takeaways
  • Hire purchase ties funding to a specific asset while an MCA gives you unrestricted cash
  • MCA repayments flex with revenue while hire purchase has fixed monthly payments
  • Hire purchase gives you ownership of the asset at the end of the term
  • An MCA is faster to arrange and does not require the asset as security

When your business needs new equipment, the question is rarely whether to buy it but how to fund it. Hire purchase has been the traditional route for decades, letting you spread the cost over time while using the equipment immediately. But a merchant cash advance offers a different approach that many businesses find more flexible.

The right choice depends on what you are buying, how you want to repay, and whether you need the money for equipment alone or for broader purposes.

How each product works

Hire purchase is an agreement where a finance company buys the equipment on your behalf and you repay in fixed monthly instalments over an agreed term, typically two to five years. You use the equipment throughout, and ownership transfers to you once the final payment is made.

A merchant cash advance gives you a lump sum of cash that you can spend on anything, including equipment. You repay through a fixed percentage of your daily card transactions. There is no fixed term, and you own whatever you buy outright from day one.

Key differences at a glance

The two products differ in almost every dimension.

FeatureHire purchaseMerchant cash advance
Funding typeAsset-specific financeUnrestricted cash
OwnershipAt end of agreementImmediate (you buy outright)
RepaymentFixed monthly instalments% of daily card sales
Typical term2 to 5 years3 to 12 months
Speed of approval1 to 3 weeks24 to 48 hours
SecurityThe asset itselfNone required
Personal guaranteeSometimes requiredTypically not required
FlexibilityTied to specific assetSpend on anything

When hire purchase makes more sense

Hire purchase is the better choice in certain situations.

When an MCA makes more sense

A merchant cash advance is the stronger option in other scenarios.

Cost considerations

Hire purchase typically has a lower headline cost because the repayment is spread over a longer period with lower rates. However, the total cost over a three to five year term can be significant when you add up all the payments.

A merchant cash advance costs more per pound per month, but the total repayment period is much shorter. The fixed factor rate means you know the exact cost from day one, with no surprises.

Can you use both?

Yes. Some businesses use hire purchase for large, long-life assets like vehicles or heavy machinery, and a merchant cash advance for smaller equipment, stock, or general working capital. The two products complement each other when used for different purposes.

Frequently asked questions

Is an MCA or hire purchase cheaper?

Hire purchase typically has lower rates, but the comparison is not straightforward because the terms are very different. An MCA is repaid over months, while hire purchase stretches over years. Compare the total cost of each option for your specific situation.

Can I buy used equipment with either option?

An MCA places no restrictions on what you buy, including used equipment. Hire purchase providers may have restrictions on the age and condition of equipment they will finance.

Which is faster to arrange?

A merchant cash advance is significantly faster, typically 24 to 48 hours compared to one to three weeks for hire purchase.

Do I own the equipment immediately with hire purchase?

No. With hire purchase, ownership transfers to you only after the final payment is made. With an MCA, you buy the equipment outright and own it from day one.